Testing…1-2-3…Testing

Guest Blogger

by Cathy Earle

“Homeschooling has proven itself to be effective—after all, homeschooled students score much higher on standardized tests than their public-school counterparts!”

“Standardized tests don't measure the important stuff, and don't do a very good job, even, of measuring the less important stuff!”

 

Having been in the homeschooling community for more than three decades, I've heard homeschooling parents justify what they're doing using test scores, only to, a month or week or day later, bash test scores as being meaningless. Which is it? Are test scores meaningful measures of the success of homeschooling, or meaningless hoops many kids are forced to jump through? We can't have it both ways.

Need Help with Testing?


This Unschooling Guide will show you a variety of ways unschoolers are handling testing in their homes.

I've collected all the material together for you, so you don't have to waste time searching all over the internet and hoping the information is right!


Find out more at this link:

I Need This Guide!

A Brief History of Standardized Testing


Early standardized tests in China and, centuries later, British India were developed to create merit-based, rather than family-status-based, systems -- to eliminate corruption and nepotism in giving people jobs and promotions. In the early 1900s, Alfred Binet was asked to find a way to predict which children would need more help in school. In his effort to measure intelligence (IQ), Binet tested skills that generally weren’t taught in school, such as focus and problem solving.

He warned about the inherent limitations of his test: 

Something as complex as intelligence could not be expressed with a single number
,
Binet said, 
and test scores could compare children only if they had similar backgrounds .

Lewis Terman of Stanford University tweaked Binet's test into the Stanford-Binet IQ test, and successfully sold it to American schools with the stated motivation to develop a meritocracy.

Similar motivations spurred the creation of the SAT test. Harvard president James Conant wanted to extend scholarships to intelligent boys who were not part of the eastern-seaboard boarding-school elite. Conant was interested in creating a classless society and argued for Thomas Jefferson's “natural aristocracy” based on intelligence and talent rather than wealth and birth. The SAT test was meant to be given to students who hadn't studied for the test -- indeed, studying for the SAT would have invalidated Conant's purpose.

Flash forward to today. The SAT is nearly ubiquitous, and dozens of other aptitude and achievement standardized tests are routinely used on millions of students. Test creation, scoring and preparation are all big businesses with billions of dollars in earnings each year. Students not only study for the SATs, they take them over and over again in search of higher scores, and school districts set aside an increasing amount of time to prepare for other standardized tests.

Worst of all, standardized tests have gone “high stakes.”

Nowadays, many American students must pass a test before they're allowed to graduate. Some educational programs must improve test scores or face closure.

Norm-referenced and Criterion-referenced Tests

  Making important decisions based solely on test scores is not only a bad idea, but it is particularly unethical to base decisions on norm-referenced tests (NRTs). They were never designed to measure the quality of learning or teaching; each question was specially designed so that half of all kids of a particular age would be able to answer it -- and half would not.


Another kind of test is criterion referenced; CRTs seek to measure student mastery of a particular body of knowledge. Course exams and written driver's tests are examples of criterion-referenced tests, and some standardized tests are as well. Studies show that well-crafted CRTs can actually help students learn material when feedback on incorrect answers is given —a condition that never occurs with standardized CRTs. Students who put effort into studying can pass a well-written CRT and perhaps even earn a perfect score. An entire classroom of students can ace a CRT.


In contrast, NRTs are not designed to test specific learned materials. Instead, they are designed to give a glimpse of students' broad knowledge, no matter what they have studied. In theory, NRTs might give some valuable big-picture feedback on the efficacy of particular educational programs—but they could only do so if the tests were like a pop-quiz that students and teachers did not and could not prepare for. 

When test prep comes into the picture, scores of NRTs such as the SAT become meaningless.


Let's be clear:

  • NRTs are designed to compare people.
  • They deliberately spread student scores out; no matter how accomplished the pool of test takers, half will answer a majority of the questions incorrectly.
  • It's not possible for the entire pool of students to score well; the tests aren't built that way.


Sources:

Alfie Kohn has written several articles on standardized testing, including “Standardized Testing and Its Victims,” Education Week , September 27, 2000. 

Fair Test, or the National Center for Fair and Open Testing, works to end misuses and flaws of standardized testing. Many informative articles and resources are available including:

City Pages published a behind-the-scenes look at scoring standardized tests: “Inside the multimillion-dollar essay-scoring business,” by Jessica Lussehop, February 23, 2011. 

Time magazine described the Annie E. Casey Foundation study's findings: “Why It's Time to Get Rid of Standardized Tests,” by Noliwe M. Rooks, October 11, 2012.

ProCon.org's “Standardized Tests.” 

Frontline's “Secrets of the SAT” interview with Nicholas Lemann.


This article was originally published in the Spring 2014 Issue of The Homeschooler Magazine . (no longer online)


More from Unschoolers on Standardized Testing:

Sharing Testing Memes...

By Sue Patterson 19 Mar, 2024
How do Unschooling Parents find each other? Sue Patterson shares 4 ways that work!
By Sue Patterson 09 Mar, 2024
Let's talk about "Screen Time." We need to shift our conversation with the kids about their love for technology and electronics.
How much is too much technology?
By Sue Patterson 04 Mar, 2024
How much IS too much - when it comes to gaming and surfing the web? Especially if you're going to unschool! Sue Patterson shares strategies for how to tackle the technology in your home!
By Sue Patterson 14 Feb, 2024
What's the big takeaway when an unschooling mom looks back? Lean into the Love. Originally written in 2012, and now updated for 2024, Sue Patterson share's what she wish she had known... way back when.
5 Signs it's time to Unschool
By Sue Patterson 08 Feb, 2024
5 Signs that it may be time for you to start unschooling! Whether you've been homeschooling and it's not working out as planned, or you're looking for alternatives to public schools, here are 5 Signs it may be time to start homeschooling from an unschooling perspective.
By Sue Patterson 23 Jan, 2024
Social media is in a flurry about the Pythagorean Theorem... why we learn it, how we learn it, what's the point? So I decided to ask my Robot Friend how DO we use the Pythagorean Theorem in real life. I think you'll be surprised!
By Sue Patterson 21 Jan, 2024
While no unschooling family would be considered "typical," a few characteristics are common for those who successfully unschool. Sue Patterson solves the mystery and shares what a few of these traits are. Perfect for those who are trying to figure out how to unschool or are looking for how to create a homeschooling routine.
Create a Reverse Bucket List - brainstorming on paper with Post-its
By Guest Blogger 04 Jan, 2024
Spend a little time with family creating your own "reverse bucket list" - identifying and celebrating accomplishments from this past year!
Incomplete Deschooling - Are Homeschoolers Doing it Wrong?
By Sue Patterson 19 Dec, 2023
This Unschooling Mom2Mom podcast/blogpost examines the idea that maybe your homeschooling struggles are because you haven't completely deschooled.
By Sue Patterson 13 Dec, 2023
If this past semester of homeschooling has been lackluster - or worse - it might be time to explore unschooling! Sue Patterson shares 5 Steps to help you move into an unschooling direction.
More Posts
Share by: